BITCOIN VS. CBDC: FREEDOM UNDER SURVEILLANCE
Share
Money is no longer what it used to be. Once, it had a smell, that of heavy metal taken from a vault, that of used paper passed from hand to hand. It had a materiality, a limit, a resistance. Today, money has become a line of code on a screen, a debt written in a bank's ledgers, an accounting illusion manipulated with a click. But the transformation doesn't stop there. For governments and central banks don't just want to administer money; they want to take absolute control of it. Central bank digital currencies—the CBDCs already being deployed in China and being prepared in Europe and the United States—are the logical outcome of this process. They are not mere technical innovations. They are the ultimate transformation of money into a surveillance tool.
CBDCs are presented as a necessary modernization. We're told about faster payments, reduced fees, and the fight against fraud. This is the official narrative, wrapped in reassuring jargon. But behind this facade, there's another, much darker reality. A CBDC is money that no longer belongs to you. It's not a coin in your pocket or a bill you hide under your mattress. It's a state-managed line, accessible in real time, modifiable at will. It's a programmable currency. The authority that controls it can decide where, when, and how you are allowed to use it. It can impose an expiration date on your salary, limit your purchases based on your social class, and block your account if you displease others. It's a world where money ceases to be neutral and becomes an instrument of discipline.
China has already shown the way. The digital yuan is being tested on a large scale, linked to the social credit system. Citizens see their behavior rewarded or punished, and their money follows this logic. Support the regime, your money circulates. Deviate, criticize, protest, and your money evaporates. You don't need prison when you have total control of the currency. Europe isn't there yet, but the digital euro is in the works. The speeches are polite, the promises reassuring, but the principle is the same: a centralized currency, managed by the ECB, where every transaction passes through a filter.
In this context, Bitcoin appears as an anomaly, a technological dissidence that rejects the logic of control. It was not born of a state but of a community. It is not administered by a central bank but by a decentralized network. It does not depend on trust in an institution but on trust in open-source code and a proof-of-work mechanism. It is incorruptible because it is not based on human promises but on a mathematical architecture. In theory, Bitcoin is the perfect way out of this monetary dystopia. It is a currency that no one can censor, that no one can block, that no one can confiscate without the private keys.
But Bitcoin's absolute freedom doesn't mean its users are free. And this is where the paradox arises. States know they can't destroy Bitcoin. They know they can't shut down a global network distributed across thousands of nodes. So they're shifting the fight. They're targeting not Bitcoin, but the humans who use it. And to do this, they're deploying the favorite weapon of modern bureaucracies: the law.
In Europe, regulation is spreading like a spider's web. MiCA, the famous regulation on crypto-asset markets, is presented as a framework to protect investors and secure the sector. But in practice, it's a series of barriers. Platforms must comply with strict compliance, capital, and oversight requirements. Unregistered players are marginalized. Independent innovation is stifled. MiCA doesn't destroy Bitcoin; it encircles its users in a regulatory pen.
Then comes DAC8, the tax directive that requires systematic reporting of all crypto transactions. No matter their size. Whether you send the equivalent of ten euros or ten thousand, the information must be transmitted to the authorities. Every movement is recorded, every transfer is a report. The logic of presumption of guilt takes hold: if you use Bitcoin, you must prove you have nothing to hide.
And there's the Travel Rule, the rule that requires every crypto transfer to be accompanied by the personal data of both the sender and the recipient. You're no longer just sending satoshis; you're sending your identity with them. As if you were slipping your ID card into every envelope, with every transaction. What was supposed to be a neutral and free currency is becoming a vector for permanent tracking.
This logic transforms Bitcoin into a paradoxical currency. On a technical level, it remains incorruptible. But on a human level, it is surrounded. You can possess your keys, but you become suspect if you refuse to use the official channels. You can use a personal node, but you risk being isolated if you don't enter the declared system. Regulators have understood that there's no point in breaking the protocol. All you have to do is make life impossible for those who want to use it freely.
This is exactly Orwellian logic. In 1984, it wasn't just about prohibiting, but about making freedom unthinkable, impractical. Surveillance wasn't limited to observing actions; it colonized thought itself. Today, with CBDCs and crypto regulation, we see the same mechanics applied to money. You don't have the right to own without being recorded. You don't have the right to transfer without being traced. Freedom becomes an offense.
Imagine the near future. You receive your salary in digital euros. Your account is directly linked to the ECB. Every expense is recorded. You want to buy a train ticket to join a protest. Your payment is declined. You want to send a donation to an association that defends causes deemed sensitive. Your money is blocked. You want to withdraw cash to maintain a little autonomy. Cash has disappeared, replaced by mandatory CBDCs. You no longer have an escape. Money is no longer neutral; it has become the digital leash of your existence.
In this future, Bitcoin remains an alternative. But a risky, monitored, and criminalized alternative. Users are tracked, transactions scrutinized, and exchanges monitored. The gateways between fiat and Bitcoin become digital customs posts. And you, a simple hodler, become a permanent suspect, a financial dissident.
Yet it is in this discomfort that true freedom lies. Bitcoin never promised ease. It promised independence. The cypherpunks who dreamed it up knew that surveillance would be total, that governments would use the technology to build invisible cages. They built Bitcoin as a peaceful weapon, a tool of silent resistance. Every block mined is a victory against control. Every transaction validated without permission is a slap in the face to Big Brother.
The question, then, is one of courage. Are we willing to face discomfort to preserve freedom, or do we prefer the gilded cage of CBDCs? The majority will likely choose comfort. Speed, security, ease. But a minority, however small, may be enough to keep the breach open. Bitcoin doesn't need a majority to function. It just needs to keep running, for individuals to carry it, for blocks to keep falling every ten minutes.
So, it's not just an economic choice, but an existential one. Do you want to be a cog in the surveillance machine, or a human being capable of saying no? CBDCs will transform money into an instrument of discipline. Bitcoin can maintain it as an instrument of freedom. But only if we use it that way, with lucidity, with courage, with perseverance.
The fight isn't futuristic; it's already here. Europe is passing its laws. China is testing its system. The United States is debating. Surveillance is advancing. Bitcoin exists. The loophole is still open. But it's narrowing. It's up to each of us to choose whether to cross it or remain on the other side, in the cage of security illusions.
And yet, all this is not inevitable. Every generation has its own test, and ours is that of currency. Our parents believed that paper money was a given, our grandparents believed that gold was eternal. We now know that nothing is taken for granted. But we have a weapon that others did not. Bitcoin is not just a technical invention, it is a peaceful declaration of war against control. It is the fire stolen from the gods, the spark that anyone can carry without asking permission. CBDCs may be imposed, MiCA and DAC8 may lock Europe in a regulatory cage, but as long as a single block is mined, as long as a single private key exists, freedom will still be possible. We don't need to be all of us, enough are enough. The loophole is there, and as long as we keep it open, Big Brother has not won. Bitcoin is the ultimate reminder that even in the face of obvious servitude, man can always choose sovereignty.
👉 Also read: