BITCOIN: THE TECHNOLOGY OF SURVIVAL
Share
As you read this, somewhere on the planet, someone is opening an app on an old phone. Not a state-of-the-art smartphone, not a device designed for scrolling through social media or viewing high-definition videos. Just a tired, dented, sometimes cracked tool, but enough to accomplish what their bank won't do. Send value. Receive payment. Bypass a currency that's melting like snow in the sun. This person is not a sophisticated speculator, much less a chart-obsessed trader. They simply want to survive. And that's where Bitcoin comes into its own. Not as a promise of wealth, but as a technology for survival.
Because survival is a brutal reality. In Venezuela, for example, hyperinflation has transformed the streets into a theater of the absurd. There are banknotes thrown on the ground. No one bends down to pick them up because they are worth less than the paper they are printed on. Wages have plummeted to the point of ridicule. A university professor, once respected and able to feed his family adequately, found himself earning three dollars a month. Three dollars is less than the price of a coffee in a Western capital. His children lost weight, his savings disappeared, and every morning he had to choose between paying for a bus ride or buying a kilo of flour. This professor says he discovered Bitcoin almost by chance, while giving private math lessons online. One of his foreign students insisted on paying him in crypto. A few satoshis, a few euros in equivalent, which allowed him not only to buy food, but also to start saving again, something he thought was lost forever. His words are simple but heartbreaking: Bitcoin has given me back the dignity of a father.
This is reality. We can debate endlessly about volatility, regulations, promises, or dangers. But ultimately, the question is stark. Would you prefer a currency that melts every day by political decree, or an imperfect but resilient, verifiable, divisible, and globally transferable digital asset? In Venezuela, the choice isn't ideological. It's vital. It's choosing between three frozen dollars or a few living satoshis.
Nigeria, Africa's largest economy, has a different but equally telling story. There, banks are closing their doors to a huge portion of the population. Young graduates find themselves excluded not for lack of talent, but for lack of paperwork or connections. Take the case of Chinedu, a developer from Lagos who works for a Californian startup. His clients wanted to pay him properly, but international wire transfers took weeks, and half his salary was swallowed up by fees. The bank demanded absurd documents, rejected his requests without explanation, and Chinedu found himself working for next to nothing. A friend told him about Bitcoin. He created a wallet, shared an address, and minutes later, he had received a month's salary without an intermediary. This money allowed him to buy equipment, launch a small programming office with two friends, and support his family. What bureaucracy forbade, the network allowed. And what his government denied him, a handful of lines of code offered him.
Family remittances are perhaps the most striking example of this parallel economy. A Nigerian domestic worker in Beirut sends part of her meager salary each month to her parents back home. With Western Union, 10% disappears in fees, and her family must wait days to receive the money. With Bitcoin or a stablecoin, the same amount crosses continents in seconds, arriving intact. The difference is extra meals, medicine bought on time, children who can return to school instead of going to work. It's not a theoretical promise. It's a plate full or empty. It's a life saved or wasted.
In Argentina, history repeats itself in other settings. This country, a member of the G20, has lived to the rhythm of monetary crises for decades. Inflation is so common that it's part of everyday culture. Argentine students have learned to immediately convert their meager purse into Bitcoin or stablecoins. Not out of a love of technology, but out of a simple instinct for self-preservation. They know that keeping pesos means accepting losses. They prefer the volatility of Bitcoin to the certainty of devaluation. One of them says he receives the equivalent of 100 euros from his parents every month. If he keeps the money in pesos, after two weeks, there are only 60 or 70 euros left in real terms. If he puts it in Bitcoin, he can at least preserve some, sometimes even see his purchasing power increase slightly. It's not an investment strategy. It's a survival strategy.
In El Salvador, President Nayib Bukele decided to go even further by legalizing Bitcoin as the official currency. Behind this political gesture lies a brutal social reality. Twenty percent of the country's GDP relies on money transfers sent by expatriates. Every dollar sent is vital to entire families. But each dollar lost an average of fifteen cents in transfer fees. For a migrant worker in Los Angeles, this meant hours of labor stolen by a banking system that preyed on the plight of the poor. By using Bitcoin and the Lightning Network, these fees drop to almost nothing. The result: children eat, homes are repaired, and families can breathe a little easier.
In East Africa, farmers are already using decentralized finance as a natural extension of this logic. In Kenya, the birthplace of mobile payments with M-Pesa, some farmers are tokenizing their future harvests to obtain microcredits on decentralized protocols. What seemed like science fiction ten years ago is now reality. A maize farmer who has never set foot in a bank can now deposit digital collateral and receive a loan in stablecoins to buy seeds. No paperwork, no discrimination, no humiliation. Just an automated contract that accepts them on an equal footing with any trader in London. Again, this isn't an ideology. It's a tool.
Everywhere, the mechanics are the same. Where traditional systems exclude, Bitcoin includes. Where local currencies disintegrate, Bitcoin conserves. Where intermediaries gorge themselves, Bitcoin liberates. Critics persist, and they are legitimate. Volatility is real. You don't pay your rent with an asset that you can't bear to see move 20% in a week. But for someone whose national currency loses 20% every month, volatility is a secondary issue. The energy footprint raises serious debates, but here again, the nuance exists. Miners set up shop where energy is cheap or wasted, transforming a lost surplus into stored value. Nothing is magic; everything is physical and economic.
Regulation remains chaotic, slow, and sometimes repressive. But citizens are adapting. They're creating ramps, hybrid solutions, and alliances between the two worlds. Your phone becomes a currency exchange, your wallet becomes a passport. The network confirms, not a teller. The old system isn't disappearing; it's transforming under the pressure of the new.
We must view this contrast clearly. In developed countries, Bitcoin is discussed as a speculative asset. There is concern about its volatility and discussion about its inclusion in investment portfolios. Meanwhile, in Venezuela, Nigeria, Argentina, or the Philippines, Bitcoin is used by families who don't have the luxury of speculation. For them, it's not an opportunity. It's insurance. It's a tool of silent resistance.
True innovation isn't technical. It's chronological. Instead of waiting three days for a wire transfer to cross borders, value circulates in minutes, even seconds. Instead of accepting that your currency will lose half its value every year, you arbitrate between risks and choose the asset that, despite its flaws, offers you a chance. Instead of storing your money in a bank that closes or confiscates it, you keep your keys and assume responsibility. This choice requires discipline and vigilance, but it makes possible what the old system made impossible.
So yes, technology isn't perfect. It can be misused. It can trap the unwary. It requires security hygiene, a discipline that traditional finance had deliberately erased. But the price to pay for this autonomy remains derisory compared to the price of powerlessness. And powerlessness kills slowly.
All this can be reduced to a simple sentence. Survival technology is the reduction of arbitrariness. Less dependence on a judging counter, more dependence on a key you control. Fewer humiliating delays, more predictable regulations. Fewer invisible fees, more transparent costs. None of this promises wealth. It simply promises a playing field a little less tilted against you.
Bitcoin is not a magic wand. It does not transform poverty into wealth. But it offers a tool that makes poverty less crushing, less permanent. It gives time, it gives breathing room, it gives room to maneuver. In a world where financial systems often turn against the most vulnerable, it is already a silent revolution. And this revolution has begun, block by block, transaction by transaction, where no one expected it. In the working-class neighborhoods of Caracas, in the villages of Nigeria, in the countryside of Kenya, in the crowded apartments of Buenos Aires.
This isn't a hypothetical future. It's a present that's spreading, invisible to those looking elsewhere. A family filling their fridge, a student protecting their savings, a father regaining his dignity. This is Bitcoin. Not a bet on a graph. A technology for survival.
👉 Also read: