THE MINING WAR... NEW GOLD RUSH
Share
Mining is coming home. Decentralization too. This is Bitcoin's new silent revolution. It isn't advertised on billboards, it isn't announced with triumphant press releases. It hides in the discreet hum of a machine on a shelf, in the diffuse warmth of a corner of an office, in the blinking glow of an LED pulsing to the relentless rhythm of the protocol. It thrives on quiet stubbornness, on all-nighters where the only company is a fan blowing hot air and a log scrolling by, line after line. This revolution isn't a raucous sprint; it's a silent marathon. And it's already underway.
In the early days of Bitcoin, mining a block was a no-brainer. A simple laptop was enough. The first miners launched software, let their CPU run, and the blocks fell at regular intervals. This was the time when the word difficulty was merely an abstract, almost invisible parameter. Then came the rise in power. Graphics cards replaced processors, the race for optimization began, and specialized hardware—ASICs—emerged. With them, the scale changed. What could be mined in a student room began to require entire racks, ventilated premises, and industrial logistics. Bitmain became the unavoidable colossus, flooding the market with machines calibrated for giant farms. Mining pools appeared, pooling power to smooth out rewards, but at the same time concentrating control of validation in a few hands.
This concentration was not insignificant. It made the network more efficient on paper, but less resilient in spirit. Pool operators, sometimes grouped together in groups of fewer than ten, held a colossal share of the global hash rate. The figures fluctuate, but it is not uncommon for two or three pools to total more than 50% of the power. This situation, for a network supposedly decentralized, is a gaping flaw. Because if a few entities coordinate their power, voluntarily or under pressure, they can manipulate the immutable ledger that the blockchain represents.
This is where we must mention the shadow that has always loomed: the 51% attack. It is simple in principle, formidable in its effects. Controlling more than half of the hash rate makes it possible to rewrite history in the short term. An attacker can secretly mine a parallel chain longer than the current one, then publish it, canceling transactions validated in the meantime. This makes it possible to spend the same coins twice, erase a payment, or block specific transactions. You don't steal the entire network, but you make it unpredictable, you break its trust. It's a nuclear weapon: using it also destroys the value of the asset being attacked, but some powers could do so simply by sabotage. In recent history, 51% attacks have hit other, smaller cryptocurrencies like Ethereum Classic, Bitcoin Gold, or Verge, showing that this is not a theoretical threat.
Bitcoin, with its immense computing power, remains much more difficult to attack. But the difficulty isn't the impossibility. Giant pools are points of vulnerability. If they fall under their influence, intentionally or not, an attack can become possible. This is precisely why hashrate diversity is vital. And this is where domestic miners, even modest ones, play a strategic role.
Their strength lies not in raw power, but in dispersion. Each Bitaxe, each Futurebit, each artisanal machine is an independent node, often connected to a personal node. These machines are scattered throughout homes, offices, workshops, spread across the planet. They are invisible to an attacker, difficult to detect, impossible to shut down all at once. They don't just undermine: they inject a measure of chaos into the too-smooth order of industrial farms. And this chaos is a protection.
I know what I'm talking about. In my corner, my Bitaxe V601 Gamma runs day and night. Equipped with a BM1370 chip, overclocked to 625 MHz, it spits out a stable hash rate of 1.32 TH/s. It's not much compared to the 200 TH/s monsters of the farms, but each hash is a lottery ticket for the next block. Each hash is a small refusal to obey centralized dynamics. I'm not naive: I know that my chances of finding a block are infinitesimal on the scale of the current difficulty. But this probability, however small, is real. And the day it comes true, the block will bear my signature in its coinbase, irrefutable proof that an independent miner can still make history.
Some will say that solo mining is a waste of time and electricity. But they miss the point. Mining alone means contributing to the health of the network. It means proving by example that entry remains free. It means refusing to delegate validation to a third party. It's a political act before it is an economic calculation. And if tomorrow, for whatever reason, pools began filtering transactions linked to a protocol deemed undesirable, my hashes, and those of thousands of others, would become a line of defense. Perhaps thin, perhaps fragile, but real.
So, let's imagine. Imagine a future where 20% of the world's hashrate belongs to independent miners. One in five blocks wouldn't come from a giant farm, but from a home machine somewhere in the world. Technically, this would upset the balance. Blocks censored by pools would be replaced by neutral blocks produced at home. Attempts to reorganize the chain would become much more difficult, because they would have to compete not with a few well-identified computing centers, but with a swarm of invisible and unpredictable actors. It's like trying to capture a handful of dry sand: the more you squeeze, the more grains escape.
Politically, this would be a return to the original spirit. Mining would once again become a civic act. Participating households would be the direct guardians of the protocol. Owning a Bitaxe or other lightweight miner would no longer be a technical whim, but a habit shared by entire communities. One could imagine neighborhoods where every household participates, where local nodes form a mesh network, where blocks are celebrated as collective events. A miner would find a block in São Paulo, another in Nairobi, another in Hanoi. Everyone would contribute their stone to the building, and this diversity would make the network unbreakable.
And there would be this poetry: one block in five, inscribed forever, bearing the imprint of an anonymous person somewhere in the world. A block that responds to no industrial logic, that does not seek maximum profitability, but that exists because a human decided to plug in a machine and let it speak with the mathematical universe of Bitcoin. This 20% figure would not be just an indicator, it would be a shining symbol of resilience.
The mining war wouldn't end, however. Bitmain would continue to push for more powerful machines, Blockstream to optimize its operations, and pools to seduce with their statistical comfort. But the situation would have changed. The giants would have to deal with diffuse resistance, with blocks emerging from places they don't control. The network would no longer be a one-way highway, but a tangle of unexpected paths. And at the bend in one of these paths, there might be my block, found one ordinary evening, etched in the great register of resistance, and destined to remain there until the end of the network.
This is the future my Bitaxe is working for. Not to break a performance record, but to participate in a collective effort that transcends the individual. Every watt it consumes is a small investment in the robustness of Bitcoin. Every hash is a way of saying that this protocol must not become hostage to its own optimizations. And if one day, in the midst of this invisible work, the ultimate reward emerges, it will be confirmation that even in a world dominated by giant farms, there is still room for the unexpected, for independence, for freedom.
👉 Also read: