THE OCTOBER 10 CRASH WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT
Share
Friday, October 10, 2025, will be remembered as one of those days when the crypto market showed its true colors: raw, unpredictable, and often ruthless. In just a few hours, the entire ecosystem shrank. Billions evaporated, traders saw their positions liquidated without even having time to comprehend what was happening, and social media turned into a theater of panic and suspicion. For many, the day was a stark reminder that cryptocurrency is not a playground for the faint of heart. For others, it was a clear demonstration of the orchestrated manipulation that still plagues this market. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in between.
It all started with a political announcement from the United States. Donald Trump, back at the center of the global game, announced 100% surcharges on Chinese imports, accompanied by new restrictions on technology exports. An aggressive, almost theatrical move, which was enough to send shockwaves through traditional markets before hitting the crypto universe hard. Within hours, Bitcoin lost nearly 8%, Ethereum 6%, and altcoins collapsed in a bottomless hemorrhage. The numbers speak for themselves: Billions evaporated. In just a few days, the total capitalization of the crypto market lost nearly $560 billion, including more than $19 billion in positions liquidated in a single day. Nearly 1.5 million traders were expelled from the market. The kind of purge that reminds us that, despite modern tools and sophisticated strategies, fear remains the most powerful driving force of capitalism.
But was this fear natural? Or was it carefully provoked? Because from the first minutes of the crash, some attentive observers noticed anomalies. Frozen orders on certain platforms. Unusual execution times. Massive transfers of tokens between exchanges, just minutes before the plunge. As if someone, somewhere, knew the wave was about to break. This is where suspicion arises: what if this crash was not only the consequence of excessive leverage and macroeconomic panic, but also the result of a perfectly orchestrated power play?
There's nothing paranoid about this hypothesis. The crypto market is fertile ground for manipulation. It only takes a few well-timed orders worth millions to trigger a cascade of liquidations. The system of "perpetuals" and leverage does the rest: one forced short position leads to ten others, then a hundred, then a thousand. All of this is amplified by bots, automatic stop-losses, and panicked traders who sell everything to save what they have left. Once the cascade is triggered, the market becomes an uncontrollable beast. The price collapses not because the value disappears, but because the internal mechanisms devour themselves.
That's what we saw that day. A flash crash, classic in form, but exceptional in intensity. The decline was so rapid it was almost surreal: some altcoins fell 30% in twenty minutes before rebounding 15% in the following hour. Volatility was no longer an indicator of risk, but a tornado. And into this tornado, small investors were the first to be sucked in. Their orders, their stops, their hopes: everything was swept away.
The most cynical will say that this kind of event is a necessity. That a market saturated with leverage must periodically clean itself up. That overconfidence must be punished. Perhaps. But others see it as the invisible hand of a minority pulling the strings. Some on-chain movements suggest that large wallets, probably institutional “whales,” moved their funds just before the crash. Four thousand ETH moved from Binance a few minutes before the drop, other suspicious amounts observed on OKX and Bybit, and even an anonymous trader who allegedly made $190 million in profit on a short position opened the day before. Too precise, too fast, too efficient to be the result of chance.
If all this is true, then October 10th was no accident. It was a show of power. A reminder that the crypto market, despite its apparent decentralization, remains vulnerable to the decisions of a handful of actors who control the liquidity, infrastructure, and sometimes the algorithms that govern trading. Decentralization, in theory, protects against control; in practice, it only fully exists for those who hold their keys, not for those who trade on centralized platforms. And that's the lesson.
This crash wasn't caused by a bug or a technical weakness, but by a perverse architecture where liquidity is concentrated in a few pockets. Altcoins plunged because they lack market depth, because their order books are fragile, and because the panic of some becomes the ruin of others. Bitcoin, on the other hand, stood firm, wobbly but solid, a reminder of its antifragile nature. Where speculative tokens were collapsing, it absorbed the shock with the slowness of a block of granite. It fell, certainly, but without breaking. As if silently reminding us that it doesn't need a market to exist, that it doesn't need authorization to survive.
As red numbers flooded screens, Telegram channels ignited. Messages flooded in, a mixture of fear, rage, and fatalism. Some cried out for manipulation, others for total capitulation. Forums filled with improvised analyses, nervous charts, suspicions of Binance, Tether, and even governments. It's in moments like these that we realize the extent to which crypto is not just a financial market, but a collective psychological space. An open-air laboratory of human behavior. A brutal mirror of our relationship to fear and loss.
Algorithms, on the other hand, don't feel anything. They execute. They sell when they should sell, buy back when they should, and amplify movements without awareness. There are long-known algorithmic manipulation techniques: “spoofing,” which consists of placing false orders to deceive the market, or “quote stuffing,” an avalanche of orders sent and canceled to slow flows and exploit latency. In an environment without safeguards, these strategies can cause artificial mini-crashes and offer profit windows to those who know where to look. On Friday, October 10, it is likely that these tools played their part. No conspiracy is required: all that is needed is an imbalance exploited by well-programmed machines.
The fact remains that the scale of the disaster goes beyond what one would have expected from a simple macro shock. Trump's tariff hike should have caused a decline of a few percent, not a $500 billion implosion in market capitalization. This shows that the market was ready to fall. All it took was a spark. A bit like a dried-up forest where the slightest flame becomes a fire. This crash therefore reveals more than manipulation: it reveals the fragility of the system. Too much debt, too much leverage, too much emotion, too much blind faith in the infinite liquidity of exchanges.
The question isn't whether someone deliberately caused this fall, but why the entire market was in a state where a single announcement could trigger a miniature apocalypse. The answer is simple: euphoria always precedes a fall. Before October 10, general sentiment oscillated between confidence and greed. The Fear & Greed Index was reading 64, a danger zone where investors stop doubting. In one day, it fell to 27. Absolute fear. As if the crowd suddenly understood that they were dancing on the edge of the void.
This kind of shock is paradoxically healthy. It cleanses the market. It eliminates excesses, illusions, false prophets. It reminds us that speculation is not a strategy, that leverage is a bomb, and that true strength lies not in the speed of trade, but in the slowness of time. The 100x traders are gone. The hodlers remain. The market, in this, has simply played its role: distinguishing those who believe in a protocol from those who believe only in a price.
Yet beyond the immediate chaos, the day left a lasting mark. Calls for regulation have multiplied. Some are calling for independent audits of exchanges, others for strict leverage limits or transparency of order books. The most radical are demanding the outright end of centralized platforms. Regulators, for their part, are watching the spectacle with a mixture of fascination and satisfaction: each crash is proof that the industry still doesn't know how to self-regulate. And in the shadows, advocates of pure Bitcoin, the one that doesn't need anyone to function, see in this chaos the confirmation of their thesis: anything dependent on a third party will eventually betray its promise.
The market slowly stabilized in the following days. Volumes declined, volatility subsided, and silence replaced the tumult. Like after a storm, the air seemed clearer, but also heavier. Everyone understood that the next crash was only a matter of time. Because the crypto market, like the sea, needs tides. It swells, it recedes, and sometimes it breaks. That's its nature. The only constant is Bitcoin. It falls with the others, but it always rises again. Each fall strengthens its relative position. Each crisis eliminates a little more of the noise around it.
October 10th was therefore a purge. But a necessary purge. Those who survived understood that the survival of capital comes before the pursuit of profit. That sovereignty is not measured in percentages but in independence. Those who held the keys slept soundly. Those who had entrusted their funds to exchanges learned once again what the word "counterpart" means. And those who understood this lesson will never forget it.
Can we talk about manipulation? Yes, in the sense that every market is manipulated by those who have the means to do so. Whales, algos, insiders, governments. But it's not a conspiracy: it's the very nature of the system. What we must remember is not anger, but lucidity. As long as you depend on a centralized infrastructure, you are not sovereign. As long as you trade with leverage, you are gambling against time. As long as you chase performance, you forget the mission. The crash of October 10 is not an accident: it's a parable. A lesson on the fragility of digital technology in the face of the brutality of reality.
That day, Bitcoin fell, but it didn't give in. Coins collapsed, promises of yield evaporated, but the chain remained intact. No block stopped being mined. No protocol failed. The heart still beat, imperturbable, indifferent to the cries of the markets. That's true strength. It's not avoiding the storm, it's resisting it. The rest is just noise.
So, what remains of October 10th? Empty wallets, expensive lessons learned, and a fundamental reminder: the market doesn't belong to you. It owes you nothing. It is neither fair nor unfair. It is. It advances, it swallows, it spits out. And you choose your role: victim of the cycle or lucid witness to its unfolding. Bitcoin doesn't need to be understood to exist. But those who do eventually detach themselves from the rest. They learn that true wealth isn't measured in dollars, but in blocks. And that with each crash, those who silently resist become a little freer.
👉 Also read: