BITCOIN AND THE ILLUSION OF AI: HUMAN VS. MACHINE
Share
Artificial intelligence has become the new idol of our time. Every day, the media announces spectacular progress, every week a new model emerges, more powerful, larger, more impressive than the previous one. Digital giants boast machines capable of imitating thought, writing poetry, coding programs, and diagnosing illnesses. We are promised a revolution comparable to the invention of electricity or the Internet. But behind this promise lies an illusion, perhaps even a fraud. Because what we call intelligence is in reality nothing more than an accumulation of data digested by opaque algorithms. And what is presented as collective progress is in truth an unprecedented concentration of cognitive power in the hands of a few multinationals.
Today's AI is not neutral. It is not free. It is not universal. It belongs to those who own it, to those who control the infrastructure, the servers, the models. It is shaped by their biases, their objectives, their limitations. Far from being an intelligence that liberates, it is an intelligence that confines. It locks individuals into bubbles of recommendations, it locks societies into surveillance systems, it locks humanity into a growing dependence on algorithms that no one truly understands.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, represents the exact opposite. Whereas AI feeds on private data sucked up without consent, Bitcoin relies on radical transparency. Every block is visible, every rule is public, every line of code can be verified. Whereas AI depends on centralized infrastructures controlled by GAFAM, Bitcoin relies on millions of independent machines spread across the planet. Whereas AI locks us into the opacity of its models, Bitcoin liberates us through the simplicity of an incorruptible protocol.
You could say that Bitcoin is the anti-AI, or more precisely, the anti-GPT. Not because it is another form of artificial intelligence, but because it embodies an inverse logic. Bitcoin does not seek to imitate human thought; it seeks to protect human freedom. Bitcoin has no hidden biases; it has no master. Its rules are fixed: 21 million, not one more. And this principle of self-imposed scarcity is exactly what current AI lacks: a limit.
AI promises an infinite abundance of content, images, and text, but this abundance comes at the cost of radical homogenization. The more models advance, the more their responses resemble each other, the more they reduce human diversity to a statistical average. Bitcoin, on the contrary, imposes scarcity, and it is this scarcity that creates value, that allows us to preserve singularity. In a world where AI seeks to standardize everything, Bitcoin reminds us that what has value is what is limited, what escapes infinite duplication.
This duel between AI and Bitcoin isn't just technical; it's civilizational. On the one hand, a future where humanity delegates its choices to centralized machines, where every decision is assisted, guided, and corrected by proprietary algorithms. On the other, a future where sovereignty is preserved by a neutral protocol, where each individual can participate in validating the truth, without depending on a higher authority.
Projects like TAO try to present themselves as an alternative, a “Bitcoin for AI.” They promise distributed intelligence, a form of decentralization of models. But the truth is more complex. Because AI, by its very nature, requires a massive concentration of data and computing power. It tends toward centralization because it depends on accumulation. Bitcoin, on the other hand, was designed from the ground up as an architecture that resists centralization. Every attempt at capture is repelled by the protocol itself. It is this fundamental asymmetry that makes Bitcoin uncomparable to AI, even a decentralized one.
One could recount this confrontation like a mythological scene: on one side, the giant machine, fueled by the data of billions of humans, piloted by sprawling corporations, seeking to absorb everything. On the other, a silent chain, block by block, which does not claim to think but only to verify, which does not claim to guide but only to protect. The first world is that of illusion: the illusion of perfect intelligence, the illusion of an optimized future, the illusion of an augmented humanity. The second is that of naked truth: a mathematical truth, implacable, incorruptible, which promises nothing but keeps its word.
The illusion of AI is seductive. It flatters our desire for ease, our natural laziness. It tells us: let us decide, we know better than you. It promises us: your mistakes will disappear, your choices will be better, your life will be optimized. But what it hides is that this optimization is always done for the benefit of whoever controls the machine. AI is not an abstract entity, it is an owned infrastructure. And any owned infrastructure sooner or later becomes an instrument of power.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, promises nothing other than what it is. No flamboyant marketing, no misleading slogans. Just a protocol, a rule, a language. It doesn't pander to our desires; it demands our discipline. It doesn't correct our mistakes; it forces us to own up to them. This is why Bitcoin is human, profoundly human, while AI is a machine that apes humanity. Bitcoin recognizes our limitations, but it builds a space where those limitations cannot be exploited by an outside authority.
We are at the beginning of this duel. Centralized AI is spreading everywhere: in businesses, governments, social networks. It is infiltrating our lives with disconcerting speed. Bitcoin, on the other hand, advances slowly, block by block, without ever yielding. Two temporalities are clashing: that of AI, fast, noisy, ephemeral; that of Bitcoin, slow, silent, eternal. Two visions of technology: one that claims to replace humans, the other that protects their freedom.
The illusion of AI may eventually collapse under its own weight. Already, its promises are running up against its limitations: obvious biases, hallucinations, massive energy consumption, and dependence on colossal infrastructure. Bitcoin, on the other hand, continues to run, unperturbed. It doesn't need to convince, it doesn't need to seduce. Its existence is enough for its existence to become a truth.
Time will tell which world will triumph. But already, the choice is there, right in front of us. Every time we use proprietary AI, we reinforce the illusion. Every time we choose Bitcoin, we reinforce the truth. It's not an abstract choice; it's an everyday one. And it may be the most important choice of our time: human versus machine, truth versus illusion, freedom versus control.
👉 Also read: